These Regulations are determined pursuant to Article 12, Paragraph 4 of the Soil and Groundwater Pollution Remediation Act.
Terms used in these Regulations are defined as follows:
Survey of the scope of pollution: means surveying the distribution and scope of soil and groundwater pollution at a remediation site
Environmental impact assessment: means assessing the remediation site’s hazardousness for public health and the living environment including soil pollution pathway assessment, groundwater pollution pathway assessment and surface water pollution pathway assessment.
Cleanup priority ranking assessment: means to assess a remediation site’s priority order for using the Soil Pollution and Groundwater Pollution Remediation Fund when performing remediation in accordance with environmental impact assessment results.
For a survey of the scope of a remediation site’s pollution the central competent authority shall fill out the following basic information:
Site name
Site location
Site owner and relevant information
Land use zoning categories within one kilometer of the site
Site layout plan
Has the pollution source been cleaned up?
Description of pollution source
Survey of scope of soil pollution
Survey of scope of groundwater pollution
Survey of scope of surface water pollution
The remediation site's basic information in the foregoing paragraph is provided in Table 1.
For the survey of the scope of soil pollution the survey method and survey period, soil sampling locations and the number of sampling points, the sampling frequency, and testing items shall be planned based on the site's soil properties and pollutant characteristics.
After completion of the survey, a map of the scope of the soil pollution survey shall be drawn and on the map the scope of the site, the number of sampling points, the sampling point location, the sampling depth and the pollution scope shall be marked.When necessary, a note shall be added about the pollution sources and their scope.
For the survey of the scope of groundwater pollution the survey method and survey period, the location, depth and number of water quality monitoring wells, the sampling frequency, and the testing items shall be planned based on the site's hydrogeological properties and pollutant characteristics.
After completion of the survey, a hydrogeological cross-section map and a map of the scope of the groundwater pollution survey shall be drawn in accordance with the following regulations:
The hydrogeological cross-section map shall show the groundwater table and the type (unconfined, confined, leaky), depth, thickness, geographical properties, and hydraulic conductivity of all polluted aquifers. If there are pollution sources, a note shall be added about the location and scope of the pollution sources.
The map of the scope of the groundwater pollution survey must mark the site area, number of monitoring well points, monitoring well location, sampling depth, and maximum concentration distribution range. Also defined must be the groundwater flow direction, flow speed, type (unconfined, confined, leaky) and hydraulic conductivity of all polluted aquifers.When necessary, a note shall be added about the pollution sources and their scope.
For those remediation sites that are located within a certain distance of competent authority officially announced drinking water intake points the pollution conditions of surface water bodies within the officially announced area must be surveyed.
The soil pollution pathway impact grade of these Regulations includes the grade for the degree of pollution (SL1) the grade for land use conditions within the scope of pollution (SL2) and the pollutant hazardousness grade (SL3).
The calculation formula in the foregoing paragraph is provided in Table 2.
The groundwater pollution pathway impact grade of these Regulations includes the grade for the degree of pollution (GW1), the grade for land use conditions within the scope of pollution (GW2), and the pollutant hazardousness grade (GW3).
The calculation formula in the foregoing paragraph is provided in Table 3.
The surface water pollution pathway impact grade of these Regulations includes the grade for the degree of pollution (SW1), the grade for land use conditions within the scope of pollution (SW2) and the pollutant hazardousness grade (SW3) .
The calculation formula in the foregoing paragraph is provided in Table 4.
All types of pollution pathway impact grades of these Regulations shall be calculated in accordance with the results of the survey of the remediation site's scope of pollution.
The cleanup priority ranking grade of these Regulations includes the soil pollution pathway total score (SL), groundwater pollution pathway total score (GW) and surface pollution pathway total score (SW):
The calculation formula in the foregoing paragraph is provided in Table 5.
The cleanup priority ranking assessment of these Regulations shall evaluate the priority order pursuant to the following regulations:
The cleanup priority ranking total score of Article 11, Paragraph 2
The groundwater pollution pathway total score of Article 8, Paragraph 2
The soil pollution pathway total score of Article 7, Paragraph 2
The surface water pollution pathway total score of Article 9, Paragraph 2
Remediation sites with an identical surface water pollution pathway total score in the foregoing paragraph shall have an identical priority order.
Depending on the needs of an individual site the central competent authority may adjust the priority order for using the Soil Pollution and Groundwater Pollution Remediation Fund in the foregoing paragraph in consideration of the remediation site's damage to society and the economy, its harm to the natural environment, its cultural impact and post-remediation benefits after review by the Soil Pollution and Groundwater Pollution Remediation Fund Management Committee.
The central competent authority review the methods for surveys of the scope of pollution may every two years, environmental impact assessments, and cleanup priority ranking assessments.
These regulations shall take effect on the date of promulgation.
| Site name | |
|---|---|
| Site location |
|
| Site owner and relevant information |
|
| Land use zoning categories within one kilometer of the site | A cadastral map must be submitted and the land use zoning category and circumstances of actual use must be described <If space provided in this column is not sufficient, please add another sheet of paper > |
| Site layout plan | <If space provided in this column is not sufficient, please add another sheet of paper > |
| Has the pollution source been cleaned up? |
|
| Description of pollution source | <If space provided in this column is not sufficient, please add another sheet of paper > |
| Survey of soil and groundwater pollution within the site | ||
|---|---|---|
| Survey of scope of soil pollution | The map of the scope of the soil pollution survey |
The following items must be included: |
| Rough estimate of polluted soil volume (see for reference map of the scope of the soil pollution survey) |
|
|
| Pollutant name and maximum pollutant concentration |
|
|
| Survey of scope of groundwater pollution | Hydrogeological cross-section map | The following items must be included:
|
| Map of the scope of the groundwater pollution survey | The following items must be included:
|
|
| If there is groundwater pollution, please directly fill out the following items. If there is no groundwater pollution, please directly fill out Item 10. | ||
| Type of polluted aquifer | ☐Non-confined aquifer ☐Confined aquifer ☐Leaky aquifer | |
Note 1: Transverse Mercator™ projection coordinates
are used as location coordinates
| Pollutant name and maximum pollutant concentration |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Rough estimate of polluted groundwater volume (see for reference map of the scope of the groundwater pollution survey) |
|
|
| For remediation sites that are located within a certain distance of drinking water intake points, please fill out the following items. For those that are not, this table ends herewith. | ||
| Survey of scope of surface water pollution | The location of water intake points and the scope of nearby surface water bodies shall be marked on a 1:5000-scale map. | |
|
Pollutant name and maximum pollutant concentration in surface water body near water intake points
|
||
| Observation items | Score |
|---|---|
| From the above items SL1 is obtained (maximum of 60 points). SL1 = | |
When the ratio of the maximum concentration of pollutants in soil to soil pollution control valuesis greater than 30:1, then 40 points are to be calculated. |
|
When the ratio of the maximum concentration of pollutants in soil to soil pollution control valuesis greater than 20:1 and smaller than 30:1, then 30 points are to be calculated. |
|
When the ratio of the maximum concentration of pollutants in soil to soil pollution control valuesis greater than 10:1 and smaller than 20:1, then 20 points are to be calculated. |
|
When the ratio of the maximum concentration of pollutants in soil to soil pollution control valuesis greater than 1:1 and smaller than 10:1, then 10 points are to be calculated. |
|
When the ratio of the maximum concentration of pollutants in soil to soil pollution control valuesis smaller than 1:1 or if there is no soil pollution, then 0 points are to be calculated. |
|
| If pollution sources still exist on the site, then the score is to be multiplied with 1.5. | |
| Observation items | Score |
|---|---|
| The highest of the above scores is to serve asSL2(maximum of 50 points). SL2 = | |
| If the pollution scope is within an officially announced drinking water source quality protection area, residential area, farmland with food crop cultivation whose cadmium and mercury concentrations exceed food sanitation standards or other areas, then 50 points are to be calculated. | |
| If the pollution scope is in an industrial park, commercial park or other areas, then 25 points are to be calculated. | |
| Observation items | Score |
|---|---|
| 3. SL3 = the product of the two above items (maximum of 50 points). SL3 = | |
| The polluted soil volume score shall be calculated in accordance with Table 2-1 | |
| The score for soil pathway pollutant substances index shall be calculated in accordance with Table 2-1 | |
| Observation items | SL |
|---|---|
| [Formula description] , SL may reach a maximum of 100 points |
| Volume of polluted soil or groundwater (m3) | Score |
|---|---|
| ≤100 | 2 |
| >100 – ≤1,000 | 4 |
| >1,000 – ≤10,000 | 6 |
| >10,000 – ≤100,000 | 8 |
| >100,000 – ≤1,000,000 | 9 |
| >1,000,000 | 10 |
| Soil pollution pathway pollutant properties (taking as representative the pollutant with the highest concentration multiple) | LD50 (mg /kg) half lethal dose: |
|---|---|
| Carcinogen classification: |
| Characteristics | Basis: | Range | Index |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pollutant toxicity | Half lethal dose LD50 (mg /kg) | ≤5 | 5 |
| >5 – ≤50 | 4 | ||
| >50 – ≤500 | 3 | ||
| >500 – ≤2,000 | 2 | ||
| >2,000 | 1 | ||
| Carcinogen classification | 1 | 5 | |
| 2A | 4 | ||
| 2B | 3 | ||
| 3 | 2 | ||
| 4 | 1 |
Note 1: Take the higher of the index figures obtained based on LD50 pollutant toxicity and carcinogen classification. If the two index figures are identical in size and both smaller than 5, then one grade shall be added to the index figure in question for use in the grading table.
Note 2: For carcinogen classification please see for reference the carcinogen classification of the (IARC) for which IARC uses the following classification:
Group 1 substances are classified as carcinogenic to humans
;Group 2A substances are classified as probably carcinogenic to humans
; Group 2B substances are classified as possibly carcinogenic to humans;
Group 3 substances are unclassifiable (as to carcinogenicity in humans);
The Group 4 category is used for substances that are probably not carcinogenic to humans.
Note 3: When LD50 and carcinogen classification do not yield relevant data, then the pollutant toxicity index shall be 1.
| Observation items | Score |
|---|---|
| From the above items GW1 is obtained (maximum of 24 points). GW1 = | |
When the ratio of the maximum concentration of pollutants in groundwater to groundwater pollution limitsis greater than 30:1, then 16 points are to be calculated. |
|
When the ratio of the maximum concentration of pollutants in groundwater to groundwater pollution limitsis greater than 20:1 and smaller than 30:1, then 12 points are to be calculated. |
|
When the ratio of the maximum concentration of pollutants in groundwater to groundwater pollution limitsis greater than 10:1 and smaller than 20:1, then 8 points are to be calculated. |
|
When the ratio of the maximum concentration of pollutants in groundwater to groundwater pollution limitsis greater than 1:1 and smaller than 10:1, then 4 points are to be calculated. |
|
When the ratio of the maximum concentration of pollutants in groundwater to groundwater pollution limitsis smaller than 1:1 or when there is no groundwater pollution then 0 points are to be calculated. |
|
| If the groundwater at the site is already polluted and if pollution sources still exist on the site, then the score is to be multiplied with 1.5. | |
| Observation items | Score |
|---|---|
| The highest of the above scores is to serve as GW2 (maximum of 50 points). GW2 = | |
| If the pollution scope is within an officially announced drinking water source quality protection area, within the scope of a reservoir watershed, residential area, farmland with food crop cultivation whose cadmium and mercury concentrations exceed food sanitation standards or other areas, then 50 points are to be calculated. | |
| If the pollution scope is in an industrial park, commercial zone or other areas, then 25 points are to be calculated. | |
| Observation items | Score |
|---|---|
| 3. GW3 is the product of the two above items (maximum of 1250 points). GW3 = | |
| The polluted groundwater volume score shall be calculated in accordance withTable 2-1 | |
| The groundwater pathway pollutant substances index shall be calculated in accordance withTable 3-1= LD50 Half lethal dose (or carcinogen classification) x solubility in water (or Koc organic carbon partition coefficient x K hydraulic conductivity | |
| Graded items | GW |
|---|---|
| [Formula description] , GW may reach a maximum of 100 points |
| Groundwater pollution pathway pollutant properties (taking as representative the pollutant with the highest concentration multiple) | LD50 (mg /kg) half lethal dose: |
|---|---|
| Carcinogen classification: | |
| Solubility in water (mg /L): | |
| Koc (L/kg) organic carbon partition coefficient: | |
| K (m/s).Hydraulic conductivity: |
| Characteristics | Basis: | Range | Index |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pollutant toxicity | Half lethal dose LD50 (mg /kg) | ≤5 | 5 |
| >5 – ≤50 | 4 | ||
| >50 – ≤500 | 3 | ||
| >500 – ≤2,000 | 2 | ||
| >2,000 | 1 | ||
| Carcinogen classification | 1 | 5 | |
| 2A | 4 | ||
| 2B | 3 | ||
| 3 | 2 | ||
| 4 | 1 | ||
| Pollutant solubility | Solubility in water (mg /L) | >105 | 5 |
| >1×104 – ≤1×105 | 4 | ||
| >5×102 – ≤1×104 | 3 | ||
| >1×101 – ≤5×102 | 2 | ||
| ≤1×101 | 1 | ||
| Organic carbon partition coefficient Koc (L/kg) | >5×104 | 5 | |
| >5×103 – ≤5×104 | 4 | ||
| >5×102 – ≤5×103 | 3 | ||
| >50 – ≤5×102 | 2 | ||
| ≤50 | 1 |
| Characteristics | Basis: | Range | Index |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hydraulic conductivity of aquifer | Hydraulic conductivity: K (m/kg) | >10-3 | 5 |
| ≤1×10-3 – >1×10-5 | 4 | ||
| ≤1×10-5 – >1×10-7 | 3 | ||
| ≤1×10-7 – >1×10-9 | 2 | ||
| ≤10-9 | 1 |
Note 1: Take the higher of the index figures obtained based on LD50 pollutant toxicity and carcinogen classification. If the two index figures are identical in size and both smaller than 5, then one grade shall be added to the index figure in question for use in the grading table.
Note 2: For carcinogen classification please see for reference the carcinogen classification of the (IARC) for which IARC uses the following classification:
Group 1 substances are classified as carcinogenic to humans
;Group 2A substances are classified as probably carcinogenic to humans
; Group 2B substances are classified as possibly carcinogenic to humans;
Group 3 substances are unclassifiable (as to carcinogenicity in humans);
The Group 4 category is used for substances that are probably not carcinogenic to humans.
Note 3: When LD50 and carcinogen classification do not yield relevant data, then the pollutant toxicity index shall be 1.
Note 4: In principle pollutant solubility is to be determined based on the index figure for water solubility. If the pollutant is an organic pollutant, it is to be determined based on the index figure for the organic carbon partition coefficient.
Note 5: if water solubility and organic carbon partition coefficient do not yield relevant data, then the pollutant solubility index figure shall be 1.
| Observation items | Score |
|---|---|
| From the above items SW1 is obtained (maximum of 30 points). SW1 = | |
| If within the scope of the site survey there is any drinking water intake point that meets the following conditions, it should be given a hazard grade in accordance with the pollution circumstances at its water intake points. | |
If the highest pollutant concentration in water exceeds two times the drinking water source quality standards,then a score of 20 points shall be calculated. |
|
If the highest pollutant concentration in water is greater than one to two times the drinking water source quality standards,then a score of 10 points is to be calculated. |
|
If the ratio of the highest pollutant concentration in water and the drinking water source quality standards,is smaller than 1:1 or if there are no surface water pollutants, then a score of 0 points is to be calculated. |
|
| If the surface water at the site is already polluted and if pollution sources still exist on the site, then the score is to be multiplied with 1.5. | |
| Observation items | Score |
|---|---|
| The highest of the above scores is to serve as SW2 (maximum of 50 points). SW2 = | |
| If the pollution scope is within a drinking water source quality protection area officially announced by the Environmental Protection Administration, within the scope of a reservoir watershed, residential area, farmland that produces food crops which exceed food sanitation standards or other areas, then 20 points are to be calculated. | |
| If the pollution scope is in an industrial park, commercial park or other areas, then 10 points are to be calculated. | |
| Observation items | Score |
|---|---|
| 3. SW3 = the product of the two above items (maximum of 250 points). SW3 = | |
| The polluted soil volume score shall be calculated in accordance with Table 2-1 | |
| The surface water pathway polluting substances index shall be calculated in accordance withTable 4-1 = LD50 half lethal dose (or carcinogen classification) x log Kow Log value of octanol-water partition coefficient (or BCF bioconcentration factor: | |
| Graded items | SW |
|---|---|
| [Formula description] , SW may reach a maximum of 50 points |
| Surface water pollution pathway pollutant properties (taking as representative the pollutant with the highest concentration multiple) | LD50 (mg /kg) half lethal dose: |
|---|---|
| Carcinogen classification: | |
| log Kow Log value of octanol-water partition coefficient: | |
| BCF bioconcentration factor: |
| Characteristics | Basis: | Range | Index |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pollutant toxicity | Half lethal dose LD50 (mg /kg) | ≤5 | 5 |
| >5 – ≤50 | 4 | ||
| >50 – ≤500 | 3 | ||
| >500 – ≤2,000 | 2 | ||
| >2,000 | 1 | ||
| Carcinogen classification | 1 | 5 | |
| 2A | 4 | ||
| 2B | 3 | ||
| 3 | 2 | ||
| 4 | 1 | ||
| Bioaccumulation | Log value of octanol-water partition coefficient log Kow | >6 | 5 |
| >4 – ≤6 | 4 | ||
| >3 – ≤4 | 3 | ||
| >2 – ≤3 | 2 | ||
| ≤2 | 1 | ||
| Bioconcentration factor BCF | >5×104 | 5 | |
| >5×103 – ≤5×104 | 4 | ||
| >5×102 – ≤5×103 | 3 | ||
| >50 – ≤5×102 | 2 | ||
| ≤50 | 1 |
Note 1: Take the higher of the index figures obtained based on LD50 pollutant toxicity and carcinogen classification. If the two index figures are identical in size and both smaller than 5, then one grade shall be added to the index figure in question for use in the grading table.
Note 2: For carcinogen classification please see for reference the carcinogen classification of the (IARC) for which IARC uses the following classification:
Group 1 substances are classified as carcinogenic to humans
;Group 2A substances are classified as probably carcinogenic to humans
; Group 2B substances are classified as possibly carcinogenic to humans;
Group 3 substances are unclassifiable (as to carcinogenicity in humans);
The Group 4 category is used for substances that are probably not carcinogenic to humans.
Note 3: When LD50 and carcinogen classification do not yield relevant data, then the pollutant toxicity index shall be 1.
Note 4: The index figure for bioaccumulation is in principle calculated based on the log Kow value. If there is no log Kow value, it shall be calculated based on BCF .
Note 5: If it is impossible to look up relevant data for log Kow and BCF , then the bioaccumulation index figure shall be 1.
Site name:
Site location (address or land lot number):
| Graded items | Total score |
|---|---|
| Soil pollutant pathway total score (SL), SL maximum of 100 points | SL = |
| Groundwater pollution pathway total score (GW), GW maximum of 100 points | GW = |
| Surface water pollution pathway total score (SW), SW maximum of 50 points | SW = |
| 4. [Formula description] | TOL = |
Note 1: The central competent authority determines pursuant to Article 12 of these Regulations that the assessment of the cleanup priority ranking and the priority order for using the Soil Pollution and Groundwater Pollution Remediation Fund.